Please visit our sponsors who help support Survey.Net
Your source for information, opinions & demographics from the Net Community!
[ 3241] 40.4% - There was too much coverage [ 2255] 28.1% - The trial should not have been on TV [ 1688] 21.0% - I didn't mind the coverage [ 466] 5.8% - I really could not care less [ 243] 3.0% - There was not enough coverage [ 117] 1.5% - No Answer
[ 5675] 70.7% - No [ 1383] 17.2% - Yes [ 696] 8.7% - Do not know [ 260] 3.2% - No Answer
[ 5798] 72.2% - Yes [ 1625] 20.2% - No [ 402] 5.0% - Do not know [ 189] 2.4% - No Answer
[ 3468] 43.2% - Guilty (1st Degree, Nicole & Ron) [ 1688] 21.0% - Not Guilty [ 1603] 20.0% - Guilty (1st Degree Nicole, 2nd Degree Ron) [ 684] 8.5% - Do not know [ 369] 4.6% - Guilty (2nd Degree, Nicole & Ron) [ 111] 1.4% - Guilty (2nd Degree Nicole, 1st Degree Ron) [ 76] 0.9% - No Answer
[ 2719] 33.9% - Not Guilty/Acquittal [ 2186] 27.2% - Guilty [ 1877] 23.4% - Hung jury [ 939] 11.7% - Mis-trial [ 293] 3.7% - No Answer
[ 3999] 49.8% - It has shaken my faith in the Justice system [ 1658] 20.7% - No effect [ 964] 12.0% - Shakespeare was right! [ 761] 9.5% - It was entertainment, nothing more [ 358] 4.5% - It has restored my faith in the Justice system [ 274] 3.4% - No Answer
[ 4892] 61.0% - OJ did do it [ 1083] 13.5% - No Answer [ 709] 8.8% - Aliens from another planet [ 462] 5.8% - Some random criminal [ 392] 4.9% - Columbian drug dealers [ 316] 3.9% - OJ's son [ 160] 2.0% - Mark Furhman
[ 3726] 46.4% - Prosecution [ 3144] 39.2% - Defense [ 1144] 14.3% - No Answer
[ 2919] 36.4% - He's doing the best he can in the circumstances [ 2709] 33.8% - He's a sad excuse for a judge [ 1875] 23.4% - His performance is satisfactory [ 258] 3.2% - No Answer [ 252] 3.1% - He's doing great
[ 2603] 32.4% - They're doing their job [ 1688] 21.0% - They're organized and professional [ 1484] 18.5% - They're an embarassement to legal professionals around the world [ 1427] 17.8% - Aside from not following the rules on occasion, they are OK [ 405] 5.0% - No Answer [ 405] 5.0% - They're the sleaziest bunch ever seen - GREAT JOB!
[ 2540] 31.7% - They're an embarassement to legal professionals around the world [ 2206] 27.5% - They're the sleaziest bunch ever seen - GREAT JOB! [ 1415] 17.6% - They're doing their job [ 874] 10.9% - They're organized and professional [ 565] 7.0% - Aside from not following the rules on occasion, they are OK [ 412] 5.1% - No Answer
[ 2354] 29.3% - A statement of the issue of race [ 2148] 26.8% - They found 'reasonable doubt' [ 952] 11.9% - They were tired of serving and wanted to end it [ 830] 10.3% - Mark Furhman's purgery [ 682] 8.5% - A protest vote against the LAPD [ 426] 5.3% - They must have been influenced in some other manner [ 368] 4.6% - Do not know [ 252] 3.1% - No Answer
[ 4004] 49.9% - Marcia Clark [ 3355] 41.8% - Johnny Cochrane [ 3076] 38.3% - Christopher Darden [ 1920] 23.9% - Barry Schef [ 1851] 23.1% - Robert Shapiro [ 1068] 13.3% - F Lee Bailey [ 634] 7.9% - Alan Derschewitz [ 562] 7.0% - Rockney Harmon [ 499] 6.2% - Hank Goldberg [ 487] 6.1% - Others
[ 2895] 36.1% - F Lee Bailey [ 2598] 32.4% - Johnny Cochrane [ 2145] 26.7% - Marcia Clark [ 1850] 23.1% - Christopher Darden [ 1610] 20.1% - Robert Shapiro [ 1279] 15.9% - Alan Derschewitz [ 1160] 14.5% - Barry Schef [ 999] 12.4% - Hank Goldberg [ 814] 10.1% - Rockney Harmon [ 595] 7.4% - Others
[ 4759] 59.3% - No [ 2583] 32.2% - Only if I didn't have to pay [ 577] 7.2% - Yes [ 93] 1.2% - No Answer
[ 5025] 62.6% - The Brown family [ 1891] 23.6% - OJ Simpson [ 614] 7.7% - Someone else [ 480] 6.0% - No Answer
|